Panayam was built to move three levers: recruiter productivity (automating first-round screening), consistency in assessment (every candidate scored against the same rubric), and faster time-to-hire (parallel, on-demand interviews instead of scheduling bottlenecks). Adjust the inputs below to your numbers — every assumption is editable and the results update live. Figures in ₱ (PHP).
Hiring volume
The scale the platform operates at. Drives every pillar below.
Time recruiters no longer spend on first-round phone screens, scheduling, and note-taking.
Standardized, rubric-based scoring reduces inconsistent judgement and the mis-hires it causes.
On-demand interviews collapse the screening stage, shortening how long each role stays open.
What it costs to run Panayam, netted against the savings above.
Drives the 5-year Total Cost of Ownership below — costs escalate and volume grows each year.
Monthly value breakdown
This is a planning estimate, not a guarantee — outputs are only as good as the inputs. Productivity and time-to-hire savings are typically the most defensible; the consistency pillar depends on your mis-hire assumptions, so treat it conservatively when presenting. Nothing here is saved to the server.
5-year Total Cost of Ownership
Full cost of owning & running Panayam over five years — one-time setup, fixed infrastructure, variable usage, and people/ops — with volume growth, price escalation, and a contingency buffer applied each year. Benefits grow with volume so the 5-year ROI stays consistent.
How it's calculated
Every figure above shown as its formula, with your current inputs substituted. Updates live as you change the numbers — nothing is hidden.